<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>H265.net &#187; NGVC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.h265.net/tag/ngvc/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.h265.net</link>
	<description>Witness the development of H.265</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 07:08:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Vote for Your Favorite Name of Next Generation Video Coding Standard</title>
		<link>http://www.h265.net/2009/10/vote-for-your-favorite-name-of-next-generation-video-coding-standard.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.h265.net/2009/10/vote-for-your-favorite-name-of-next-generation-video-coding-standard.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 02:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yu Liu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HVC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPEG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGVC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VCEG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.h265.net/?p=350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">As mentioned in the <a href="http://www.h265.net/2009/07/current-status-of-hvc-high-performance-video-coding-in-mpeg.html">previous post</a>, MPEG/VCEG has launched a new video coding standardization project, which is tentatively named as High-performance Video Coding (HVC). The formal name is still under discussion. A short list of candidates most supported in <a href="http://mailman.rwth-aachen.de/mailman/listinfo/mpeg-newvid">MPEG-newvid</a> mailing list are summarized by <a href="mailto: ken@zetacast.com">Ken McCann</a> from ZetaCast,</p>
<ul>
<li>HVC &#8211; High-efficiency Video Coding (Note: not High-performance Video Coding? I prefer the latter)</li>
<li>EPVC &#8211; Enhanced Performance Video Coding</li>
<li>HEVC &#8211; High Efficiency Video Coding</li>
<li>HCEV &#8211; High Coding Efficiency Video</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;">An online poll was set up at <a href="http://www.doodle.com/p24xi3v4p92rdbne">Doodle [Poll: Name of new MPEG/VCEG Standard]</a>.  Your opinion is very important. Please vote with your <strong>real </strong>name to keep the process transparent.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.h265.net/2009/10/vote-for-your-favorite-name-of-next-generation-video-coding-standard.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Future Collaboration between MPEG and VCEG</title>
		<link>http://www.h265.net/2009/07/future-collaboration-between-mpeg-and-vceg.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.h265.net/2009/07/future-collaboration-between-mpeg-and-vceg.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yu Liu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HVC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPEG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGVC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VCEG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.h265.net/?p=112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">As well-known, JVT (a joint video team between MPEG and VCEG) has achieved great success in the standardization of the state-of-the-art video compression, including H.264/AVC, SVC, and MVC. The academic and industry want to continue the success in the collaboration between MPEG and VCEG. Some proposals from VCEG suggest the H.NGVC (or H.265) standardization should be collaboratively done with MPEG to produce a significantly advanced video coding standard and to avoid producing multiple similar standards, which confuse the market. VCEG agrees that conducting this work jointly with MPEG will be beneficial to avoid duplication of efforts in this area. Therefore, in this MPEG London meeting, a joint meeting between MPEG and VCEG discusses the future collaboration. However, the collaboration method arouses a lot of controversy, focusing on which one of the following practical experiences should be chosen:</p>
<ul>
<li>Practical experience 1: MPEG-2, a integrate part of video subgroup when under WG 11 a[......]</li></ul><p class='read-more'><a href='http://www.h265.net/2009/07/future-collaboration-between-mpeg-and-vceg.html'>Read More...</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.h265.net/2009/07/future-collaboration-between-mpeg-and-vceg.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Preliminary Requirements for NGVC</title>
		<link>http://www.h265.net/2009/04/the-preliminary-requirements-for-ngvc.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.h265.net/2009/04/the-preliminary-requirements-for-ngvc.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yu Liu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGVC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Requirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VCEG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.h265.net/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the 37th VCEG meeting,  held in Yokohama on April 15-18, a potential &#8220;NGVC&#8221; project standing for next-generation video coding was discussed, which could mean either an extension of H.264/AVC or a new standard, depending on which form of standardization is determined to be appropriate for the technology design.</p>
<p>The preliminary requirements of the NGVC project focus on the following areas.</p>
<p>1. Coding efficiency:</p>
<ul>
<li>NGVC should be capable of providing a bit rate reduction of 50% at the same subjective quality</li>
</ul>
<p>2. Complexity:</p>
<ul>
<li><span>NGVC should be capable of operating with a complexity ranging from 50% to 3 times H.264/AVC High Profile.</span></li>
<li><span>When operated at a complexity of 50% compared to H.264/AVC High Profile, NGVC should provide a 25% bit rate savings compared to H.264/MPEG-4 AVC High Profile at equivalent subjective quality.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span>3. Applications</span><span>:</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span>Low-delay interactive video communications</span></li>
<li><span>Surveillance</span></li>
<li><span>Streaming</span></li>
<li><span>Broadcast</span></li>
<li><span>Digital cinema and large-screen digital imagery</span></li>
<li><span>Mobile video enter[......]</span></li></ul><p class='read-more'><a href='http://www.h265.net/2009/04/the-preliminary-requirements-for-ngvc.html'>Read More...</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.h265.net/2009/04/the-preliminary-requirements-for-ngvc.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
