Accordingly to the tentative timeline, the final standard will be approved by July 2012.

Hi. I know it’s not related here, yet I can’t find anywhere else to ask. Is there any ETA for publishing the first H.265 stable version?

感觉H.265被侮辱了。

开发个编解码器不是错，跑出来冒充H.265就不对了。
H.26x系列是ITU-T关于音视频编码的系列标准。如果你对自己的编解码器有信心，就往ITU-T提嘛。被批准以后，你再做宣传也不迟。
JCT-VC一大队人哼哧哼哧做了半天，都不好意思说自己是H.265。你还是别再出来丢人了，看了我想吐。

ZPAV (H265) is audio-visual codec protocol, very different from H264/MPEG4,
ZPAV (H265) basic algorithm is wavelets, SPIHT, BSW, MMW, ……

ZPAV (H265) download address : https://sourceforge.net/projects/****/

ZPAV (H265) 是 音视频 压缩解压 协议，非常不同于H264/MPEG4，
ZPAV (H265) 的基本算法 是 小波，多级树集合群，广义小波，数学形态小波，……

ZPAV (H265) 下载地址 : https://sourceforge.net/projects/****/

please,can you tell me how can we get basis images of MDDT .I have see the mddct i have found that there is something different .I want to know the principle of the algorithm.

I would prefer HVC.
Simple and not popular in search engines, yet.

High Performance Video Coding

hi, Are you sure this project will be called H.265?

The documents of CfP (WG11 N11113/Q6 AM91) and ToR (WG11 N11112/Q6 AM90) will be approved by MPEG and VCEG on January 22 afternoon. I will upload the latest version of these documents as soon as possible.

Thank you for the fast news!
I am happy to hear that CfP is finally completed.
Is it the final version? or it will be modified?

One more thing!
I think the link for the ToR document is corrupted.

From the proposed ones the HVC sounds good, but I think that if the new standard follows the official name evolution (i.e. H.265 or MPEG-x), then it is not necessary to add descriptive names. The reason is that once these standards become old, then their descriptive names sound very optimistic for that period of time.

HDVC – High Definition Video Coding

Everybody knows HD trade mark, so the shortcut is obvious !

HVC – High Performance and Efficient AVC
eAVC – Enhanced AVC
iAVC – Improved AVC

Can anyone share the document C257 using the ftp? Thanks in advance.

Thanks the anonymous helper for uploading the documents of “C219″, “C463″, “C464″ and “C405″. The documents are moved to the directory: http://ftp.h265.net/.

By the way, could you kindly upload the documents of “C437″ and “C402″, too? Thanks a lot!

About the collaboration for new video standard project between MPEG and VCEG, please refer to this post http://www.h265.net/2009/07/future-collaboration-between-mpeg-and-vceg.html for details.

Thanks Yu, When can we expect this to happen?

Did the collaboration for H.264/MPEG4 Part-10 AVC happen before the standardition process was announced?

- Thanks.

Currently, HVC and NGVC are the new video standard project names of MPEG and VCEG, respectively. But MPEG and VCEG may set up a joint collaborative team (JCT), just like JVT, to avoid producing multiple similar video standards.

Is HVC a standard coming out of MPEG + VCEG JVT? Or is this just from MPEG? Can anyone help understand?

Thanks,
Ranga

Yes, if you just want to evaluate the subjective quality of reconstructed video, you have to use the KTA decoder to parse the KTA bitstream.

>>The KTA software includes a lot of additional coding tools that are not compatible with H.264 syntax, so >>you can’t use H.264 video player to view the KTA bitstream.
Thank you. So basically if I want to evaluate the stream then have to do it after decoding?

The KTA software includes a lot of additional coding tools that are not compatible with H.264 syntax, so you can’t use H.264 video player to view the KTA bitstream. If you want the KTA software to produce a H.264 compatible bitstream, you should disable the KTA MACRO definitions in the “defines.h”, i.e., “ADAPTIVE_FILTER” to “SIMPLIFIED_RDPIC_DECISION”.

Please, Did anyone ever tested the KTA software and tried to view the .264 file it produced? I mean, I tried several versions but none of them produced a .264 file that can be viewed by players such like StreamEYE. Or did it need some specific players or something?

I can suggest MPEG-5 or Ultra Video Coding (MPEG-4/UVC) or Extented Video Coding (MPEG-4/EVC)?

or:

Advanced Extended Video Coding (AEVC).

The documents of “C219″, “C463″, “C464″ and “C405″ are the inputs of ITU-T SG16 meetings in Geneva, instead of VCEG meetings. Unfortunately, those documents cannot be downloaded from the ITU-T website unless you are the member of ITU-T.

If someone has those documents, could you kindly upload them to the ftp server of h265.net?
ftp address: ftp://ftp.h265.net
port number: 21
username: guest@h265.net
password: guest

Thank you in advance.

Excuse me,
Can you send me the document about “C463″, “C464″, and “COM16-C405″ ?
I want to realize more about the KTA software.
thank you!

MPEG-8 sounds like way too big of a step, especially if they held onto MPEG-4 for such a long damn time. I also think it will be MPEG-4/HVC, but I was hoping for an official reference, is there any out there?

I don’t think so. MPEG-4/HVC or MPEG-8 sounds reasonable, since MPEG video standards seem to prefer the even number or 2^N.

What will be the MPEG number of H.265? MPEG-5, right?