Witness the development of H.265
Author : Jie Dong - posted 12 articles

Special Session at DCC 2015 on “extensions to the HEVC standard”

2014-05-25 Uncategorized Post Comment Views(0)

There will be a special session on “extensions to the HEVC standard” at the Data Compression Conference (DCC) 2015. The paper submission deadline is Nov 3, 2014. More information about the submission can be found at
Celebrating its 25th annual edition, the Data Compression Conference (DCC) is an international forum for current work on data compression and related applications. The conference addresses coding methods for specific types of data (text, images, video, audio, medical data, scientific data, biological sequences, graphics data, web content, etc.) and the application of techniques from information theory and data compression to networking, communications, storage, and search (including image and information mining/retrieval, archiving and backup, human-computer interfaces, compressed data structures, visual search, object recognition, compressive sensing, rate-distortion coding, rate allocation, and compression-related sta[......]

Read more

Permanent Link: Special Session at DCC 2015 on “extensions to the HEVC standard”

Next Step of JCT-VC: Scalable Extensions of HEVC

2012-12-24 SHVC Post Comment Views(9,887)

As the first phase of HEVC standard (single layer video coding standard) comes close to finalization, scalable extensions of HEVC have been under discussion since the 7th JCT-VC meeting. The final call for proposal (CfP) [1] was issued jointly by ITU-T/VCEG and ISO/IEC/MPEG in July 2012 after the 10th JCT-VC meeting, and companies and organizations are invited to submit proposals in response to this CfP.
The CfP includes two categories using HEVC and H.264/AVC as the base layer formats, respectively. In each category, the coding parameters and conditions are specified differently, such as scalability type (spatial scalability and SNR scalability), base/enhancement layer spatial resolution ratio (1.5x and 2x), and coding configuration (all intra (AI) and random access (RA)). In combination of differet coding conditions, there are in total seven sets of performance data: five for Category 1, using HEVC base layer, (AI 2x, AI 1.5x, RA 2x, RA 1.5x, and RA SNR) and two for Category 2, using[......]

Read more

Permanent Link: Next Step of JCT-VC: Scalable Extensions of HEVC

Two Loop Filters in KTA

2010-08-01 KTA 1 Comment Views(9,750)

KTA employs two concatenating loop filters: the deblocking loop filter and the adaptive loop filter.
The deblocking loop filter, inherited from H.264/AVC, alleviates the blocking artifacts caused by the block-based DCT+MCP video coding framework. It uses a bank of low-pass filters, which are adaptively applied to block boundaries according to the boundary strength (BS), and provides better visual quality and improved capability to predict other pictures.
Adaptive loop filter (ALF; click here for introduction) is placed in the MCP loop after the deblocking process, and is used to restore the degraded picture (caused by compression) such that the MSE between the reconstructed and source frames is minimized. The coefficients of ALF are calculated and transmitted on a frame basis and the minimum mean squared error (MMSE) estimator is used. For each degraded frame, ALF can be applied to the entire frame or to local areas. The former is known as frame-based ALF. In the latter case, additiona[......]

Read more

Permanent Link: Two Loop Filters in KTA

Adaptive Interpolation Filter for Video Coding

2010-07-21 KTA 2 Comments Views(15,666)

Why use interpolation in video coding?  
Motion-compensated prediction (MCP) is the key to the success of the modern video coding standards, as it removes the temporal redundancy in video signals and reduces the size of bitstreams significantly. With MCP, the pixels to be coded are predicted from the temporally neighboring ones, and only the prediction errors and the motion vectors (MV) are transmitted. However, due to the finite sampling rate, the actual position of the prediction in the neighboring frames may be out of the sampling grid, where the intensity is unknown, so the intensities of the positions in between the integer pixels, called sub-positions, must be interpolated and the resolution of MV is increased accordingly.  
Interpolation in H.264/AVC  
In H.264/AVC, for the resolution of MV is quarter-pixel, the reference frame is interpolated to be 16 times the size for MCP, 4 times both sides. As shown in Fig. 1(a), the interpolation defined in H.264 includes two stages, inter[......]

Read more

Permanent Link: Adaptive Interpolation Filter for Video Coding

Introduction to Test Model under Consideration (TMuC)

2010-06-27 H.265/HEVC 11 Comments Views(15,260)

TMuC is the initial test model of JCT-VC, but it is not formally adopted as a test model of the draft standard, as no thorough testing has been performed for such a possible combination of tools. The coding tools in TMuC will be further tested to confirm their effectiveness, before adopted in a formal test model.
TMuC provides more flexibility than H.264/AVC. The  basic coding unit, called coding tree block (CTB), which has a similar role to the macroblocks in H.264/AVC, can have variable sizes (a power of 2). The sizes of the largest and smallest CTBs are specified in the sequence parameter set (SPS). A frame is divided into non-overlapped largest CTBs (LCTB), e.g., 128×128, and then each LCTB can be further divided in a recursive tree representation.
Each CTB has its own prediction type (intra/inter) and prediction partition. The partition can be symmetric, just as in H.264/AVC, or asymmetric, e.g., 64×64 block can be partitioned into 64×16/64×48 or 16×64/48&[......]

Read more

Permanent Link: Introduction to Test Model under Consideration (TMuC)

The First JCT-VC Meeting, Dresden, DE

2010-06-19 H.265/HEVC Post Comment Views(9,316)

During Apr. 15-23, 2010, the first meeting of JCT-VC was held in Dresden, DE. In the meeting, 27 responses to the Call for Proposal, issued in Jan. 2010, were reviewed and the associated video material was evaluated in extensive subjective tests.
Tentative Conclusions from CfP Responses Reviews
Coding tools used in respective proposals are listed in JCTVC-A203. High-level noteworthy aspects from the review of the proposals and the outcome of the subjective tests are outlined:

  • Substantial progress in coding efficiency has clearly been demonstrated, compared with H.264/AVC
  • There is no indication of a need to change the fundamental architecture of “conventional” hybrid video coding designs to achieve a substantial improvement
  • Inclusion of support of larger block sizes in a highly variable (typically tree-structured) block segmentation approach is a major common theme, although large block sizes were not found in all proposals that did well subjectively (and objectively)
  • Modif[......]

Read more

Permanent Link: The First JCT-VC Meeting, Dresden, DE

Mode-Dependent Directional Transform (MDDT) in JM/KTA

2009-09-22 KTA 15 Comments Views(13,620)

The intra prediction in H.264/AVC is a type of spatial domain directional prediction, which means different intra prediction modes represent different prediction directions, such as horizontal, vertical, and diagonal. An intra-coded MB can be partitioned into 4×4, 8×8, or 16×16 intra prediction blocks. The 4×4 and 8×8 intra prediction blocks have nine prediction directions, respectively, and the 16×16 block has four. Hence, totally 22 (9+9+4) intra prediction modes are used in H.264/AVC. The residue usually has high energy along the direction of prediction, as edges are more difficult to be predicted than smooth areas.
Mode-dependent directional transform (MDDT) was proposed to compact the residue produced by intra prediction. It consists of a series of pre-defined separable transforms; each transform is efficient in compacting energy along one of the prediction directions, thus favoring one of the intra modes. The type of MDDT is coupled with the selected[......]

Read more

Permanent Link: Mode-Dependent Directional Transform (MDDT) in JM/KTA

R-D Performance of 1/8-pel MCP on HD Sequences

2009-06-07 KTA 7 Comments Views(5,314)

The technique of 1/8-pel interpolation [AD09] was proposed for motion-compensated prediction (MCP) and adopted in KTA software. Three types of interpolation filters are used for 1/2-, 1/4-, and 1/8-pel sub positions, respectively.

  • [-3, 12, -39, 158, 158, -39, 12, -3]/256 for 1/2-pel sub positions.
  • [-3, 12, -37, 229, 71, -21, 6, -1]/256 and [-1, 6, -21, 71, 229, -37, 12, -3]/256 for 1/4-pel sub positions.
  • Bilinear filter for 1/8-pel sub positions.

  The frequency response of the interpolation filter is shown in the following figure. As can be seen, it is almost an ideal low-pass filter with a gain of 8 and a cutoff frequency π/8.
Frequency response
  According to the performance reported in the proposal, the gain on CIF/QCIF sequences is quite significant, i.e., up to 14% bit-rate reduction. I tested this technique based on a set of HD sequences. As shown in Table 1, the R-D performance is measured by BDPSNR [1], i.e., PSNR improvement at the same bit-rate or bit-rate reduction at the same PSNR.
Performance of 1/8-pel MCP

Read more

Permanent Link: R-D Performance of 1/8-pel MCP on HD Sequences