<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vote for Your Favorite Name of Next Generation Video Coding Standard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.h265.net/2009/10/vote-for-your-favorite-name-of-next-generation-video-coding-standard.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.h265.net/2009/10/vote-for-your-favorite-name-of-next-generation-video-coding-standard.html</link>
	<description>Witness the development of H.265</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 02:35:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandro</title>
		<link>http://www.h265.net/2009/10/vote-for-your-favorite-name-of-next-generation-video-coding-standard.html/comment-page-1#comment-2463</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.h265.net/?p=350#comment-2463</guid>
		<description>I would prefer HVC.
Simple and not popular in search engines, yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would prefer HVC.<br />
Simple and not popular in search engines, yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yousaf Khan</title>
		<link>http://www.h265.net/2009/10/vote-for-your-favorite-name-of-next-generation-video-coding-standard.html/comment-page-1#comment-2462</link>
		<dc:creator>Yousaf Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.h265.net/?p=350#comment-2462</guid>
		<description>High Performance Video Coding</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>High Performance Video Coding</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harilaos Koumaras</title>
		<link>http://www.h265.net/2009/10/vote-for-your-favorite-name-of-next-generation-video-coding-standard.html/comment-page-1#comment-2450</link>
		<dc:creator>Harilaos Koumaras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.h265.net/?p=350#comment-2450</guid>
		<description>From the proposed ones the HVC sounds good, but I think that if the new standard follows the official name evolution (i.e. H.265 or MPEG-x), then it is not necessary to add descriptive names. The reason is that once these standards become old, then their descriptive names sound very optimistic for that period of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the proposed ones the HVC sounds good, but I think that if the new standard follows the official name evolution (i.e. H.265 or MPEG-x), then it is not necessary to add descriptive names. The reason is that once these standards become old, then their descriptive names sound very optimistic for that period of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: papuzka</title>
		<link>http://www.h265.net/2009/10/vote-for-your-favorite-name-of-next-generation-video-coding-standard.html/comment-page-1#comment-2446</link>
		<dc:creator>papuzka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.h265.net/?p=350#comment-2446</guid>
		<description>HDVC - High Definition Video Coding

Everybody knows HD trade mark, so the shortcut is obvious !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HDVC &#8211; High Definition Video Coding</p>
<p>Everybody knows HD trade mark, so the shortcut is obvious !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anurag</title>
		<link>http://www.h265.net/2009/10/vote-for-your-favorite-name-of-next-generation-video-coding-standard.html/comment-page-1#comment-2445</link>
		<dc:creator>Anurag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.h265.net/?p=350#comment-2445</guid>
		<description>HVC - High Performance and Efficient AVC
eAVC - Enhanced AVC
iAVC - Improved AVC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HVC &#8211; High Performance and Efficient AVC<br />
eAVC &#8211; Enhanced AVC<br />
iAVC &#8211; Improved AVC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Profession ZZ &#187; Blog Archive &#187; La compression vidéo</title>
		<link>http://www.h265.net/2009/10/vote-for-your-favorite-name-of-next-generation-video-coding-standard.html/comment-page-1#comment-2443</link>
		<dc:creator>Profession ZZ &#187; Blog Archive &#187; La compression vidéo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.h265.net/?p=350#comment-2443</guid>
		<description>[...] H.265 (on l&#8217;appellera comme cela mais il devrait plus vraisemblablement s&#8217;appeler HVC ou NGC..) est donc officiellement lancé depuis cet été. Le groupe MPEG a fait son &#8220;call [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] H.265 (on l&#8217;appellera comme cela mais il devrait plus vraisemblablement s&#8217;appeler HVC ou NGC..) est donc officiellement lancé depuis cet été. Le groupe MPEG a fait son &#8220;call [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiago</title>
		<link>http://www.h265.net/2009/10/vote-for-your-favorite-name-of-next-generation-video-coding-standard.html/comment-page-1#comment-2426</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.h265.net/?p=350#comment-2426</guid>
		<description>I can suggest MPEG-5 or Ultra Video Coding (MPEG-4/UVC) or Extented Video Coding (MPEG-4/EVC)?

or:

Advanced Extended Video Coding (AEVC).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can suggest MPEG-5 or Ultra Video Coding (MPEG-4/UVC) or Extented Video Coding (MPEG-4/EVC)?</p>
<p>or:</p>
<p>Advanced Extended Video Coding (AEVC).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack</title>
		<link>http://www.h265.net/2009/10/vote-for-your-favorite-name-of-next-generation-video-coding-standard.html/comment-page-1#comment-2420</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.h265.net/?p=350#comment-2420</guid>
		<description>MPEG-8 sounds like way too big of a step, especially if they held onto MPEG-4 for such a long damn time. I also think it will be MPEG-4/HVC, but I was hoping for an official reference, is there any out there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MPEG-8 sounds like way too big of a step, especially if they held onto MPEG-4 for such a long damn time. I also think it will be MPEG-4/HVC, but I was hoping for an official reference, is there any out there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yu Liu</title>
		<link>http://www.h265.net/2009/10/vote-for-your-favorite-name-of-next-generation-video-coding-standard.html/comment-page-1#comment-2419</link>
		<dc:creator>Yu Liu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 06:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.h265.net/?p=350#comment-2419</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think so. MPEG-4/HVC or MPEG-8 sounds reasonable, since MPEG video standards seem to prefer the even number or 2^N. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think so. MPEG-4/HVC or MPEG-8 sounds reasonable, since MPEG video standards seem to prefer the even number or 2^N. <img src='http://www.h265.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack</title>
		<link>http://www.h265.net/2009/10/vote-for-your-favorite-name-of-next-generation-video-coding-standard.html/comment-page-1#comment-2418</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.h265.net/?p=350#comment-2418</guid>
		<description>What will be the MPEG number of H.265? MPEG-5, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What will be the MPEG number of H.265? MPEG-5, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
