<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adaptive Post/Loop Filters in JM/KTA &#8211; Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.h265.net/2009/08/adaptive-post-loop-filters-in-jmkta-part-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.h265.net/2009/08/adaptive-post-loop-filters-in-jmkta-part-2.html</link>
	<description>Witness the development of H.265</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:21:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jie Dong</title>
		<link>http://www.h265.net/2009/08/adaptive-post-loop-filters-in-jmkta-part-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-2541</link>
		<dc:creator>Jie Dong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 01:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.h265.net/2009/08/adaptive-postloop-filters-in-jmkta-part-2.html#comment-2541</guid>
		<description>T and Q mean transform and quantization, respectively; similarly, T^{-1} and Q^{-1} mean inverse transform and dequantization, respectively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T and Q mean transform and quantization, respectively; similarly, T^{-1} and Q^{-1} mean inverse transform and dequantization, respectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rafi</title>
		<link>http://www.h265.net/2009/08/adaptive-post-loop-filters-in-jmkta-part-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-2540</link>
		<dc:creator>rafi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 23:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.h265.net/2009/08/adaptive-postloop-filters-in-jmkta-part-2.html#comment-2540</guid>
		<description>Hi people , is it possible may i know whats is &quot;T&quot; and &quot;Q&quot;  or T+Q in BALF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi people , is it possible may i know whats is &#8220;T&#8221; and &#8220;Q&#8221;  or T+Q in BALF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahul</title>
		<link>http://www.h265.net/2009/08/adaptive-post-loop-filters-in-jmkta-part-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-2539</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 04:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.h265.net/2009/08/adaptive-postloop-filters-in-jmkta-part-2.html#comment-2539</guid>
		<description>JCTVC-A033 was indeed very useful.  I came across Coding Block Tree synchronized ALF in both A033 and B205.  Are there other documents that describe this ALF in detail?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JCTVC-A033 was indeed very useful.  I came across Coding Block Tree synchronized ALF in both A033 and B205.  Are there other documents that describe this ALF in detail?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jie Dong</title>
		<link>http://www.h265.net/2009/08/adaptive-post-loop-filters-in-jmkta-part-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-2538</link>
		<dc:creator>Jie Dong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 04:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.h265.net/2009/08/adaptive-postloop-filters-in-jmkta-part-2.html#comment-2538</guid>
		<description>Maybe JCTVC-A033 is useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe JCTVC-A033 is useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahul</title>
		<link>http://www.h265.net/2009/08/adaptive-post-loop-filters-in-jmkta-part-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-2537</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 00:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.h265.net/2009/08/adaptive-postloop-filters-in-jmkta-part-2.html#comment-2537</guid>
		<description>I am looking for a document that describes the algorithm for deblocking filter in H.265.  It looks like this filter is different from the one used in H.264/AVC.  Are there any documents describing/giving an overview other than JCTVC-A205?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am looking for a document that describes the algorithm for deblocking filter in H.265.  It looks like this filter is different from the one used in H.264/AVC.  Are there any documents describing/giving an overview other than JCTVC-A205?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandip Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.h265.net/2009/08/adaptive-post-loop-filters-in-jmkta-part-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-2406</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandip Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 10:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.h265.net/2009/08/adaptive-postloop-filters-in-jmkta-part-2.html#comment-2406</guid>
		<description>Adaptive loop filter is an additional block apart from traditional in-loop deblocking filter. Wiener filter is a MSE-optimal stationary linear filter which estimates the original signal from the signal corrupted by additive noise. Here additive noise is the coding noise(mostly due to lossy quantization). Is it fair enough to assume that coding noise of every pixels in a frame have the same statistics ? Or should we group pixels with identical coding noise and apply Wiener filter on pixels within the same group ? I am thinking of some kind of segementation as proposed by Zhang.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adaptive loop filter is an additional block apart from traditional in-loop deblocking filter. Wiener filter is a MSE-optimal stationary linear filter which estimates the original signal from the signal corrupted by additive noise. Here additive noise is the coding noise(mostly due to lossy quantization). Is it fair enough to assume that coding noise of every pixels in a frame have the same statistics ? Or should we group pixels with identical coding noise and apply Wiener filter on pixels within the same group ? I am thinking of some kind of segementation as proposed by Zhang.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wenhao Zhang</title>
		<link>http://www.h265.net/2009/08/adaptive-post-loop-filters-in-jmkta-part-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-2398</link>
		<dc:creator>Wenhao Zhang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.h265.net/2009/08/adaptive-postloop-filters-in-jmkta-part-2.html#comment-2398</guid>
		<description>In-loop filter is definitely better than the post filter. Qualcomm has proposed a similar Wiener adaptive filter scheme which used as post filter, but their gain is much smaller compared to BALF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In-loop filter is definitely better than the post filter. Qualcomm has proposed a similar Wiener adaptive filter scheme which used as post filter, but their gain is much smaller compared to BALF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jie Dong</title>
		<link>http://www.h265.net/2009/08/adaptive-post-loop-filters-in-jmkta-part-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-2394</link>
		<dc:creator>Jie Dong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 03:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.h265.net/2009/08/adaptive-postloop-filters-in-jmkta-part-2.html#comment-2394</guid>
		<description>Using the filter in loop can improve the capability of predicting other pictures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using the filter in loop can improve the capability of predicting other pictures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hurumi</title>
		<link>http://www.h265.net/2009/08/adaptive-post-loop-filters-in-jmkta-part-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-2392</link>
		<dc:creator>hurumi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 17:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.h265.net/2009/08/adaptive-postloop-filters-in-jmkta-part-2.html#comment-2392</guid>
		<description>Do you think that BALF or QALF can provide much better efficiency compared to post-filter only design? I&#039;m not sure that in-loop type is required for this kind of filtering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think that BALF or QALF can provide much better efficiency compared to post-filter only design? I&#8217;m not sure that in-loop type is required for this kind of filtering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yu Liu</title>
		<link>http://www.h265.net/2009/08/adaptive-post-loop-filters-in-jmkta-part-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-2383</link>
		<dc:creator>Yu Liu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.h265.net/2009/08/adaptive-postloop-filters-in-jmkta-part-2.html#comment-2383</guid>
		<description>The proposals of BALF/QALF didn&#039;t describe how to get the array filter_luma_base/filter_chroma_base. I guess that it is obtained by a training set.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The proposals of BALF/QALF didn&#8217;t describe how to get the array filter_luma_base/filter_chroma_base. I guess that it is obtained by a training set.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

